The following cmavo is discussed in this section:

The most usual way of constructing a bridi from a selbri such as klama and an appropriate number of sumti is to place the sumti intended for the x₁ place before the selbri, and all the other sumti in order after the selbri, thus:

Here the sumti are assigned to the places as follows:

(Note: Many of the examples in the rest of this chapter will turn out to have the same meaning as Example 9.1 ; this fact will not be reiterated.)

This ordering, with the x₁ place before the selbri and all other places in natural order after the selbri, is called “standard bridi form” , and is found in the bulk of Lojban bridi, whether used in main sentences or in subordinate clauses. However, many other forms are possible, such as:

Here the selbri is at the end; all the sumti are placed before it. However, the same order is maintained.

Similarly, we may split up the sumti, putting some before the selbri and others after it:

All of the variant forms in this section and following sections can be used to place emphasis on the part or parts which have been moved out of their standard places. Thus, Example 9.2 places emphasis on the selbri (because it is at the end); Example 9.3 emphasizes la .bastn. , because it has been moved before the selbri. Moving more than one component may dilute this emphasis. It is permitted, but no stylistic significance has yet been established for drastic reordering.

In all these examples, the cmavo cu (belonging to selma'o CU) is used to separate the selbri from any preceding sumti. It is never absolutely necessary to use cu. However, providing it helps the reader or listener to locate the selbri quickly, and may make it possible to place a complex sumti just before the selbri, allowing the speaker to omit elidable terminators, possibly a whole stream of them, that would otherwise be necessary.

The general rule, then, is that the selbri may occur anywhere in the bridi as long as the sumti maintain their order. The only exception (and it is an important one) is that if the selbri appears first, the x₁ sumti is taken to have been omitted:

Here the x₁ place is empty: the listener must guess from context who is going to Boston. In Example 9.4 , klama is glossed “a goer” rather than “go” because “Go” at the beginning of an English sentence would suggest a command: “Go to Boston!”. Example 9.4 is not a command, simply a normal statement with the x₁ place unspecified, causing the emphasis to fall on the selbri klama. Such a bridi, with empty x₁, is called an “observative” , because it usually calls on the listener to observe something in the environment which would belong in the x₁ place. The third translation above shows this observative nature. Sometimes it is the relationship itself which the listener is asked to observe.

(There is a way to both provide a sumti for the x₁ place and put the selbri first in the bridi: see Example 9.14.)

Suppose the speaker desires to omit a place other than the x₁ place? (Presumably it is obvious or, for one reason or another, not worth saying.) Places at the end may simply be dropped:

Example 9.5 has empty x₄ and x₅ places: the speaker does not specify the route or the means of transport. However, simple omission will not work for a place when the places around it are to be specified: in

le karce occupies the x₄ place, and therefore Example 9.6 means:

This is nonsense, since a car cannot be a route. What the speaker presumably meant is expressed by:

Here the sumti cmavo zo'e is used to explicitly fill the x₄ place; zo'e means “the unspecified thing” and has the same meaning as leaving the place empty: the listener must infer the correct meaning from context.